Author: Majlis

  • Bal Snehi Award

    Bal Snehi Award

    Majlis received the ‘Bal Snehi Award’ from MSCPCR in recognition for our work on child protection. The award ceremony was attended by Women and Child Welfare Minister Aditi Tatkare. The greatest joy was coming back to celebrate with the amazing team.

  • Taking a backward step

    Taking a backward step

    Bombay High Court’s comments on consent in POCSO cases can demoralise survivors, adversely affect trial outcomes

    In a recent ruling, Justice Milind Jadhav of the Bombay High Court granted bail to an accused who had been in jail for over five years for the rape of a 14-year-old girl in 2019. The Bombay High Court’s decision should be applauded as it is in keeping with the Supreme Court’s longstanding principle that “bail is the rule and jail is the exception”. However, the judge’s remarks regarding consent and other aspects of the case appear overreaching. These comments raise concerns about the interpretation of the judiciary of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

    The case is of a 14-year-old girl who had gone to visit her married sister and did not return after the visit. The girl’s father found her four days later with the accused, and an FIR under the POCSO Act was lodged.

    The POCSO Act, passed in 2012, was a significant step in protecting children from sexual abuse and exploitation. The Act raised the age of consent to 18 years, ensuring that minors cannot legally consent to any form of sexual activity. This change aimed at aligning the legal definition of a child with the understanding that individuals under 18 are not mentally or emotionally prepared to make informed decisions about sexual matters, thus protecting them from coercion, manipulation, or abuse. The Act also introduced mandatory reporting, placing a duty on every individual to report incidents of sexual offences against children.

    The Act has several beneficial procedures to be followed at police stations and courts, including fast-track trials where the child’s testimony is to be recorded within two months and the trial to be concluded within one year. Victims are provided a support person to avoid re-traumatisation and to ensure rehabilitation. The POCSO Act has been amended several times since, but mostly to increase the severity of punishments, including the introduction of the death penalty.

    Despite the noble intentions of the POCSO Act, the reality on the ground is far from ideal. A large number of cases remain unreported especially when the accused is a known person, and even when cases are reported, victims traverse a difficult legal journey and endure significant trauma, often receiving little or no support.

    In this context, the Bombay High Court’s comments are concerning. Justice Jadhav noted that although the girl was a minor, “the facts of the present case indicate that she (the 14-year-old victim) had sufficient knowledge and capacity to know the full import of her actions.” The judge further remarked, “The girl was in love with the man, and had voluntarily stayed with him and had a consensual encounter”.

    These comments are problematic because they misinterpret the law regarding consent. The POCSO Act makes it unequivocally clear that minors cannot consent to any sexual activity regardless of the circumstances. Victim blaming and claiming that the victim consented to the sexual act is the most commonly used defence in rape trials. POCSO Act puts the onus of proof on the accused once the prosecution establishes a prima facie case. The premature comments of the judge on the merits of the case based solely on the FIR statement and medical reports will have a far-reaching impact, particularly for lower courts.

    Anyone working with child victims of sexual abuse knows the trauma they have to go through on the day of reporting. FIR, medical examinations and statements before the child welfare committee often have contradictions as the child is dragged to all these agencies in the first 24 hours and has to repeat her story. Pressure from the police, her own family as well as the accused’s makes the victim, already terrified and scarred, extremely vulnerable. Contradictions in the victim’s statements should have been evaluated by the trial court, which is in the best position to examine all evidence.

    The judge’s comments on the non-violent nature of the offence and the absence of criminal antecedents in the accused’s record are also flawed as in most cases of sexual abuse the incidents are rarely violent. The harm caused by sexual abuse, regardless of physical violence, is profound and life-altering for the victim. The judge’s reasoning reflects an outdated and overly simplistic understanding of sexual offences.

    At the same time, the Bombay High Court missed an important opportunity to address the issue of severe delay in the trial. In this instance, the case has been pending for over five years even though the POCSO Act mandates that trials be completed within one year. As of 2022, the Maharashtra Crime Records reported a pendency of over 38,000 cases with courts managing to dispose of only 5 per cent of pending cases each year. These delays cause a huge challenge for victims, who are forced to live with the uncertainty of prolonged legal proceedings.

    Lastly, Justice Jadhav mentions that the Supreme Court has supported granting bail to young offenders in specific circumstances to avoid the regressive influences of prolonged imprisonment. Yet, he fails to pull up the lower court as to why the accused who had filed four bail applications, two of them in person, in the sessions court, was not granted bail.

    Higher courts must interpret the law as it stands, ensuring that justice is served based on existing statutes and legal principles. It is the responsibility of Parliament to change or amend the law if it is deemed inadequate or outdated. It would be prudent for high courts to avoid making overreaching comments about victims and the merits of a case while granting bail as they demoralise victims and send a wrong message to the lower courts. These comments may also adversely impact the outcome of the trial.

    Dmello is director and Agnes founder of Majlis, a legal centre for women and children. Views are personal

    Majlis’ team of women lawyers, social workers provide *legal and social support* to women and children facing sexual and domestic violence. Call 07506732641 Mon-Fri 11 am to 7 pm.

    https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/taking-a-backward-step-9856713

  • Centre for Gender Rights and Research

    Centre for Gender Rights and Research

    We are happy to announce the inauguration of the “Centre for Gender Rights and Research”, on 18th February 2025 a collaboration between KES Shri. Jayantilal H. Patel Law College, Kandivali, Mumbai in collaboration with Majlis a legal centre for women and children.

    The centre was inaugurated by Adv. Audrey Dmello, Director, Majlis and Ms. Viral Dave, Principal, KES Law College.

    The centre will be a vibrant hub for learning and discussion, offering a range of resources and activities focused on gender identity, societal norms, and legal jurisprudence. Curated events will serve as a vital meeting ground for knowledge dissemination and community engagement. The centre will be open access to students, faculty and general public.

    At the event Adv. Audrey Dmello, addressed the audience on basic fundamental rights enshrined in our constitution in promoting gender justice and the recognition of historical injustices faced by women and children.

    Students promised to challenge societal norms and actively contribute to an equitable world. 

  • CWC & Childline let down victim of abuse

    On February 18th, 2025, a 14-year-old girl called Majlis*, stating she has been facing severe physical abuse by her mother, stepfather, and brother for a long time. Her body was covered in deep cuts and burn marks. Desperate and frightened, the girl had come to her friend’s home, where she was sobbing uncontrollably, pleading not to be sent back. She had approached the police twice prior but they turned her away.

    We contacted Childline 1098 (a 24-hour emergency service for children in need of care and protection). We also informed the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) Mumbai, but they both refused to help. In fact, the CWC dismissed the case, labelling it a “family matter” and advised us to settle the matter with the family. We requested that the child be admitted to a shelter but CWC refused saying it cannot be done without police intervention and kept shouting about following procedure. CWC insisted that the child should stay at her friend’s house, even though we clearly communicated that this posed a danger not only to the child but also to the family offering her refuge. We then reached out to the District Women and Child Officer, and hoped that with directions from a superior authority they would take the child to a shelter but no one turned up.

    Around midnight  the police, accompanied by the girl’s brother, arrived at her friend’s house and forcibly took her to the police station. Despite the friend’s mother’s plea to not return the child to her abusive family, they ignored the request and sent her back to the very environment where she had been harmed, without even recording her statement.

    This harrowing incident highlights a grim reality. Even with numerous agencies in place to protect vulnerable children, we have failed this girl. It’s no surprise that so many children go missing in Maharashtra —this is the painful consequence of failing to address abuse within families. By forcibly sending children back to their abusers, we are putting them in even more perilous situations. The recent trend of District Collectors insisting on restoring children from shelters to their families, even when those families are the perpetrators of abuse, is deeply troubling.

    What future are we providing our children if we continue down this path? The systems designed to protect children must be held accountable.

    Follow Up 21st February, 2025: The Majlis team finally managed to meet the girl at the police station. She once again recounted the horrific physical abuse she had endured for an extended period, primarily at the hands of her mother and brother. Her body bore the visible scars of burns and cuts. She expressed a deep desire to leave her home but was filled with uncertainty. She didn’t know what to expect from a shelter, how she would occupy her time, or whether she would still be able to continue her education. In a moment of innocence, she asked, “Will I get to meet my friends?”

    Despite our attempts to reassure her, the police and Childline team instilled fear, telling her that shelters were frightening places and that she was better off with her mother. Later the police took her for a medical examination, and produced her before the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) to give her final statement.

    The entire experience has been harrowing and leaves one to reflect on the future of young girls trapped in abusive homes. What hope do they have when the systems meant to protect them fail to offer solace, understanding, or even basic reassurance?

    *Majlis’ team of women lawyers, social workers provide legal and social support to women and children facing sexual and domestic violence. For legal advice call 07506732641 Mon-Fri 11 am to 7 pm.

  • Roundtable tackles challenges faced by victims of sexual violence

    Roundtable tackles challenges faced by victims of sexual violence

    Roundtable of Stakeholders tackles challenges faced by victims of sexual violence in accessing Manodhairya Scheme, Special Relief, and Support Services

    Majlis, in collaboration with the Women and Child Development (WCD) Department, Mumbai City, hosted a roundtable to address key challenges in the implementation of the Manodhairya Scheme, Special Relief measures, and the role of Special Educators, Translators, and Interpreters. The meeting included representatives from the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA), Child Welfare Committee (CWC), District Child Protection Unit (DCPU), senior police officers, and women police officers from Mumbai City.

    Launched in 2013 by the Maharashtra Government, the Manodhairya Scheme provides financial relief and rehabilitation to victims of sexual assault and acid attacks. The meeting discussed significant challenges, including delays in police referrals to DLSA, difficulties victims face when opening bank accounts, and the failure to process interim compensation within the required seven days. Additionally, there was a lack of transparency about the status of compensation orders passed.

    While the scheme also promises rehabilitation, including counselling, legal aid, and vocational training, stakeholders noted that these services were not being provided.

    Another crucial topic was Rule 8 under the POCSO Act, which enables the CWC to provide immediate relief for essential needs like food, clothing, and transport. However, both DLSA and DCPU reported a lack of allocated funds to make such payments. It was agreed to seek clarification from the WCD on how to address this gap.

    The meeting also highlighted the shortage of trained Special Educators, Translators, and Interpreters, particularly for victims with disabilities or language barriers. Although the POCSO Act mandates DCPU to maintain a list of qualified professionals, the process had not been initiated due to confusion over payment procedures.

    Adv. Audrey Dmello, Director of Majlis, emphasised, “The roundtable allowed us to openly discuss challenges and collaboratively find solutions to improve victim support through better inter-agency coordination.”

    Majlis offers legal counselling for women and children facing sexual and domestic violence. For assistance, contact 07506732641 (Mon-Fri, 11 AM – 7 PM).

  • ‘She was in her uniform when she learnt she was pregnant’

    ‘She was in her uniform when she learnt she was pregnant’

    Written by Vinod Kumar Menon in Sunday Mid Day


    Pen’s tribal children are hitting puberty even before their teens begin, and their parents are too busy to supervise. Pregnant at ages as young as 12, they are forced to make the hard choice between underage marriage or abortion The police said that despite cases being registered under the POCSO Act, the girls’ families often refuse to cooperate during the trial due to community pressure.

    Teenage pregnancy is a dark reality for residents of tribal hamlets in Pen and nearby talukas of Raigad district, where every month on an average five-10 minor girls in the age group of 12 to 17 years are becoming pregnant —a fact that comes to light when they miss their menstrual cycle and visit the primary health centre or rural hospital, where tests confirm pregnancy.

    The irony is that most of the girls are either school or junior college students, and their partners are youths barely older than them. Sex with a minor is an offence under the POCSO Act and though the police in a few cases register an FIR, pressure is built on the survivor’s parents to not register the case, or settle the issue by getting the accused married to the girl—thereby encouraging child marriage, which is also an offence under the law.

    Seventeen-year-old Radhika (name changed), a class XI student, missed her menstruation cycle in October. En route to her junior college, she visited the Sub District Civil Hospital in Pen, where Dr Suraj Mhatre who was on duty gave her a self-testing pregnancy kit.

    “She was in her college uniform, and when she learnt that she was pregnant, it left her in tears,” said Dr Mhatre. Under the law, he was bound to inform the police, which he did.

    “On an average, around five or more cases of unwed teenage pregnancy get reported per month at the hospital, and most of the girls are from the tribal hamlets,” the doctor added.

    “Once the police and parents are informed, the swabs of the minor victim are collected and the accused medically examined, as and when brought by police. The victim is referred for counselling, and the police register an offence. But the efforts of the police and doctors to counsel the girls and parents, are often in vain as family members and the community put pressure on them to not pursue the case. Even if a case is registered they tend not to cooperate during the trial,” said Dr Mhatre.

    Dr Netra Patil, a medical officer attached to the Primary Health Centre at Kamarli, said an added complication is that most of the girls are anaemic and in some cases malnourished, too.

    “On an average we get around three to five cases of pregnancy in school and college-going girls under 18, who complain of stomachache, sudden vomiting, missing their period, etc. We refer these cases to the district civil hospital in Alibaug as our centre is not authorised to carry out sonography,” said Dr Patil. Some tribal hamlets were reporting a regular inflow of teenage pregnancy cases—for example, nine cases in June 2024, six in August, seven in September and 10 in October—“shocking data from just our primary health centre”, the doctor added. One reason for sometimes repeated pregnancies in the same girl, Dr Patil said, is the practice of having a live-in-relationship before marriage in some tribal hamlets.

    Other factors, said Dr Archana Singh, psychiatrist at the Civil Hospital in Alibaug, include the use of oxytocin in cattle. This hormone passes on to humans through the consumption of milk, and is believed to have induced early puberty in both boys (12 years) and girls (10 years). This brings on sudden hormonal changes and increases their sexual drive as well. “Moreover, in many families, both parents are working and there is no adult supervision of teenagers. Easy mobile phone access with free data connectivity makes online pornographic content easily available, and lures young boys and girls into physical relations,” explained Dr Singh, who counsels most of these victims during her weekly visit to the Sub District Civil Hospital in Pen. Dr Singh added that the situation is complicated further by the practice of child marriage in certain communities within the Adivasis, who believe that sexual intimacy before marriage is a sin.

    Santosh Thakur, founder president of Gram Sanvardhan Samajik Sanstha, a local NGO which works for the welfare of tribals in Raigad district, said, “We had launched a program called ‘Alpa Vain Garodar Mata’ (teenage pregnant mothers), wherein like-minded doctors from the PHC went with our activists and the Pen police to some of the hamlets during Ganesh Chaturthi and Navratri. This is when many tribals who live outside their village come home for the festival. This program was the result of a shocker when a 12-year-old and a 14-year-old from hamlets here tested positive for pregnancy. We tried to explain the pros and cons of teenage unwed pregnancy and child marriage, and the police explained the deterrent laws to discourage males from having physical relations with vulnerable girls.”

    Raigad District Zilla Parishad’s Chief Executive Officer Dr Bharat Basetwad said he was not aware of the issue, but promised action. “I will personally speak to the Civil Surgeon of Raigad District, get first-hand information from all health officials, and immediately carry out awareness campaigns in these tribal areas. Pen has a Project Director rank officer for Tribal Welfare, handling three districts—Raigad, Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg—who can check what is happening on the ground.”

    Atmaram Dabe, Project Director, Integrated Tribal Development Project (ITDP), Pen, said he would look into the issue. “I have taken charge two months ago, and have not come across such instances. The health department may have information on the same,” he said.

    Sandeep Bhagul, Senior Police Inspector at Pen, who took charge a few months ago, said community pressure hampers progress of cases. “We do register offences under POCSO, as and when the complaint is received or we are intimated by the local health authorities. However, once the case is lodged and the accused arrested, the parents do not cooperate much during the trial due to community pressure, and our efforts to nail the culprit go in vain. We have started conducting counselling sessions in these hamlets, and we will intensify our visits.”

    Advocate Audrey Dmello, Director of the NGO Majlis, said, “In most cases, the perpetrator of the crime is someone closely related, staying under the same roof, within the family, or a school bus staffer or tutor or the neighbourhood, or a romantic partner where the girl is lured to have physical relations. Registering a police complaint is not easy in most cases and it is worse in rural areas, due local political and influential community pressure.

    Moreover, due to lack of education and understanding of legal proceedings, the victim and parents continue to be under tremendous stress and easily fall prey to pressure tactics from the community head or accused family, she added.

    According to Dmello, the problem worsens when the minor has crossed four months or is in an advanced stage of pregnancy, and no Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP), is possible without court permission. The court relies on the report of the expert medical board constituted under the Grant Medical College and JJ Group of Hospital, as per directives.

    If the girl has to be admitted to hospital under police care, her emotional and mental trauma is worse, especially when she has to undergo an MTP and is not sure whether this is a sin, Dmello said. In case she is in an advanced stage of pregnancy, she has to stay in a government- or civic-run labour ward till term. These victims themselves are in need of protection and care, unaware about the internal and external changes in their body, and need counselling support, she added.

    A case Majlis has undertaken is that of a minor tribal girl, who dropped out of school when she became pregnant. The accused, who stays in the vicinity, refused to marry her after police arrested him under POCSO. “Though from a poor background, the victim decided to deliver the baby, who is today two years old and the mother 17. We are struggling to get the child her birth certificate and Aadhaar card made since the last one year, so that they could be registered under various state / central government social security schemes, but in vain,” said Dmello.

    “The Bal Sangopan Yojana provides a monthly financial aid of Rs 2,250 (earlier Rs 1,100) for health, education and nutrition till the child attains 18 years of age. Both the mother and child could have been supported financially, had the birth certificate and Aadhaar card been in place,” she added.

    Majlis offers legal counselling to women and children facing sexual and domestic violence. For assistance call their helpline —07506732641.

    Nishit Kumar, Founder and Managing Director of Centre for Social and Behavioural Change Communication, said, “Maharashtra is India’s no.1 GDP state, and has been ranked third on governance. Almost 200 years ago Savitribai Phule established education for girls—we just celebrated her birth on January 3. However, the facts of the state as per the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) 2019-2020 are:

    . Nearly 10 per cent of all teenage girls in the age group of 15-19 were pregnant at the time of the survey—that is one in every 10 teenage girls.

    . Of these pregnant girls 20.1% per cent had no schooling, 26.1 per cent had less than five years of schooling, 11.7 per cent completed between five and nine years, only 5.3 per cent completed 10-11 years of schooling and only 4.9 per cent completed 12 or more years of schooling.

    . 76.8 per cent of mothers surveyed were moderately to severely anaemic.

    . Child stunting was over 40 per cent.

    “The NFHS survey is done once in four years and the questions are asked to women of age 20-24 years. To determine both child marriage as well as teenage pregnancy the question asked pertains to age of the first child, the second child and so on. However NFHS doesn’t measure the current year’s status of either child marriages or teenage pregnancy—presumably because answers to such questions would not reveal the truth. Hence the NFHS data is always underrepresented and reflects past data. This, in spite of the fact that institutional deliveries are reported at near 100 per cent in the state. For some reason, the health department does not generate data on the mother’s age at time of delivery, even though every hospital— private or government—records it,” said Kumar.

    Teenage pregnancies demonstrate the failure of both the educational systems to keep girls in school, and of social schemes that provide for girl children in order to encourage parents to educate girls. Besides, getting young girls to bear the burden of pregnancy and child-rearing at an age when they want to study and play is torture—not to mention the lack of agency among girls and their right to education,” he said.

    Kumar cited the example of a woman who was a “bai” at a hospital in Dhule, whom he met in July. “She told me she was married at age 13 and sent to her in-laws’ house in a different village. There she saw kids of the family playing and would join them until she was pulled out by her mother-in-law and beaten. She ran away several times to her parents’ home but her father always took her back to the in-laws. Her eyes filled with tears and a deep anger as she narrated this part of her life. She was pregnant at 15,” he said.

    Adding to the complicated scenario, officials in districts with significant tribal populations routinely state that tribals do not follow marriage rituals and just start staying together (a practice that is now growing in urban areas as live-in relationships, which the Supreme Court has recognised and accepted as a valid form of companionship). The government, however, is torn between directions to preserve tribal ways of life and the need to integrate them into mainstream life with access to modern medicine, education and jobs. As a result, governments do not customise messaging for social schemes, education, laws etc for tribals.

    And so they live—on the periphery of modern life and yet not a part of it.

    That said, there have been some highly motivated District Collectors who have made strong efforts to get tribes to be a part of modern systems. But they are the exception to the rule, Kumar said.

    “Indian customary laws, including certain tribal practices that permit cohabitation without marriage and allow underage girls to engage in relationships leading to early pregnancies, present a critical conflict with the constitutional rights and protections afforded to women and minors. While the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution emphasises the autonomy of Scheduled Areas and the preservation of tribal customs, this autonomy cannot operate in isolation from the moral and legal principles enshrined in the Constitution,” said Advocate Mohini Priya, Advocate on Record, Supreme Court of India.

    “Statutory frameworks such as the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, which criminalises sexual activity with minors, and the Constitution’s mandate to uphold fundamental rights, particularly for vulnerable groups, cannot be undermined by customary practices,” stressed the advocate, adding, “Such practices, including underage cohabitation or early pregnancies, directly contravene Article 21, which ensures the right to live with dignity, and Article 14, which guarantees equality before the law. Legislative intent behind POCSO clearly establishes that protecting minors from exploitation is a non-negotiable priority. Attempts to exempt Scheduled Areas from such protective legislation under the discretionary powers granted to governors by the Fifth Schedule pose serious questions about the balance between cultural autonomy and constitutional safeguards.”

    Advocate Mohini also said that India’s international obligations, particularly under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), further reinforce the need to eliminate practices that compromise the dignity, autonomy, and health of women and minors. The persistence of patriarchal traditions within certain tribal communities, coupled with inadequate legal protections, risks perpetuating systemic violations of constitutional and sexual rights.

    “Judicial precedents, such as Shayara Bano v Union of India and Joseph Shine v Union of India, have firmly established that customs and traditions inconsistent with fundamental rights cannot be sustained. The judiciary has repeatedly emphasised that the supremacy of the Constitution must prevail over any practice, however culturally entrenched, that infringes upon basic human rights,” said Mohini.

    “While the cultural relevance of tribal laws should be respected, they must be subjected to Constitutional scrutiny to ensure they do not perpetuate prejudice or harm vulnerable communities. The harmony between tribal sovereignty under the Fifth Schedule and the overarching Constitutional mandate is essential for safeguarding the rights of women and children, reinforcing the principles of equality and dignity, and ensuring justice for all. Only by aligning customary practices with constitutional values can India truly fulfill its commitment to upholding justice and protecting its most vulnerable citizens,” she said.

    Venkatesh Nayak, Director of Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI), New Delhi said, “Both preventive and remedial measures must be taken on a war footing to tackle this phenomenon. Starting with the provision of an adequate means of livelihood for the parents of these girl children, the government agencies must concentrate on a multi-pronged approach to deal with the issue, such as institutionalising healthcare and counselling facilities for these girls. Sex education and behaviour change communication must focus on those responsible for the teenage pregnancies and not just the girl children.”

    Nayak added that registrars of births and deaths as well as UIDAI officials “must get out of their ivory towers” and set up camps in these villages to provide birth certificates and other identity documents to the unwed mothers and their babies. “The criminal justice system must act swiftly to penalise those responsible for the predicament of these teen mothers under the applicable laws like POCSO, without exception,” he added.

    The newly constituted team at the NHRC must take up this issue immediately and devise rehabilitation measures for these girl children on an emergency basis, Nayak said. Specialist NGOs should team up with Departments of Social Work and qualified psychiatrists to launch community counselling initiatives to erase the stigma that is forced on these girl children. “Beti bachao, beti padhao sloganeering has to become a living reality for these disadvantaged female citizens who are often ignored and treated like the dregs of society,” he averred.

    Solicitor Stuti Galiya said “Sexual abuse cannot be allowed in the garb of culture and traditions. Traditions and conventions cannot be used as a medium to endanger the lives of young girls, especially from low socio-economic backgrounds who fall under the vulnerable category, because of lack of information, education, and means to exercise decision-making authority.”

    India has some of the toughest laws on the topic, such as the POCSO Act, 2012, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act. Because of the multiplicity of regulations, sometimes there is ambiguity on various aspects. Coupled with this, the focus of the existing laws is more on procedural and punitive aspects, which involves extensive paperwork, mandatory police reporting, permissions from judiciary, increased police interactions, which becomes an overall traumatic and intimidating experience for the victim and her family, she said.

    Apart from this, Galiya said, the courts have time and again passed various landmark judgments stressing the government’s obligation to ensure the girl child’s safety and their duty to prevent her from being abused. However, on the ground, the reality is that implementation of these laws is poor, with delays in prosecutions due to the overburdened nature of courts and stigmatisation in most cases. Even if the victim and her family gather the courage to raise their voice, considering the lacunae and other procedural issues with the justice delivery system in the country and the attached social stigma, the victim is often left frustrated and helpless. When the wrongdoer is released on bail within a few weeks, the victim and her family live in constant fear of revenge. There is definitely a need to ensure that law is not just left on paper. A balanced approach needs to be taken to ensure that there is no abuse of the process of law in the quest of criminalising the wrongdoer, but at the same time ensuring that no leniency is shown in genuine cases.

    “A positive change will only be seen when civil society, policymakers, law enforcement, and judiciary work together to raise awareness,” said Galiya. “It is important to harmonise the legal framework and address areas of ambiguity. State-specific legislation (in addition to national legislation), keeping in mind local customs and traditions, will prove effective. It is important to create better social welfare frameworks to identify vulnerable children or those who have had experience of maltreatment. Different state machineries, such as police and medical staff need to adopt an empathetic and sensitive approach rather than making it an intimidating experience for the victim and her family.”

    Impact of child marriage
    Insecurity of survival and protection:
    .  Early delivery due to child marriage is a risk to girls’ life and health. Possibility of death due to childbirth complications, frequent pregnancies. Early responsibility of the family leads to domestic violence, less employment opportunities and early workload, financial exploitation of the girl child.

    Deprivation of overall development and participation:
    .  Financial dependence due to incomplete education of girls and lack of access to skills. Separation from family and friends after marriage. Deprivation of social participation.
    Courtesy: Centre for Social and Behavioural Change Communication, Mumbai

    Reasons for child marriage
    Multidimensional poverty
    .  Scarcity of basic facilities like health, roads etc
    .  Lack of livelihood options
    .  Lack of education opportunities
    .  Marriage is used to pay off debt to avoid the responsibility and reduce the expenses
    .  Opportunities for migration

    Ignorance of law and its importance
    .  No awareness about the law
    .  Social rituals and traditions
    .  Less education

    Natural and man-made disasters
    .  Drought, flood and scarcity of water
    .  Covid-19, lockdown and loss of production
    .  Farm loss and debt

    Social and cultural elements
    .  Concerns about girls’ sexuality and safety
    .  Girls are valued less than boys — rights, behaviour, opportunities and status of girls and boys
    .  The notion that girls are incapable of making decisions
    .  Getting girls married without investing in their education, treating them as “paraaya dhan”
    .  Child marriage is socially accepted

    Migration and child marriage
    .  Marriage of a minor boy or girl increases the family income
    .  Not sending girls to school so that they look after the house

    https://www.mid-day.com/sunday-mid-day/article/she-was-in-her-uniform-when-she-learnt-she-was-pregnant-23463164

  • Child Marriage is invalid – until the girl whilst being a major validates the same

    Association for Social Justice Research v. Union of India 2010 (118) DRJ 324(DB)

    A father married his 11–12 year old daughter to an adult man. When an NGO intervened, the father and “husband” argued that no money had been exchanged and that the girl would have a better life in marriage. The Court held that marriage of a minor girl is presumptively invalid unless the girl decides otherwise when she reaches 18 years of age.

    A.K. Sikri, Ajit Bharihoke

  • Consent of a woman in both termination and continuation of pregnancy is of utmost importance

    Meera Santosh Pal v Union of India SCC/SC/462/2017

    The petitioner’s foetus was diagnosed with anencephaly (a severe medical congenital condition in which a large part of the brain is absent) Meera Santosh Pal, a 22-year-old woman, had petitioned before the Apex Court under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution, requesting the Court to allow her to have her pregnancy terminated medically. She had realised that she was in grave danger after learning that her pregnancy had been diagnosed with anencephaly, a condition that causes the foetal skull bones to remain unformed and was both untreatable and guaranteed to result in the infant’s death during or shortly after birth. This disorder is also known to put the mother’s life in jeopardy. In the 24th week of her pregnancy, the petitioner had approached the Supreme Court of India. he Court observed that despite the fact that the pregnancy was in its 24th week, it would be reasonable to allow the petitioner to terminate the pregnancy due to the risk to the mother’s life and the foetus’ incapacity to live outside the womb. The most important aspect is that she has the right to take any and all measures required to protect her own life from needless harm. Given the threat to her life, there is no doubt that she has the right to defend and preserve her life, especially because she has made an educated decision. Her freedom to exercise it appears to be within the bounds of reproductive autonomy The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioner while placing reliance on the Suchita Shrivasta case that this choice of a woman falls under the protection guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution. The Court also emphasised the point of the consent of a woman in both termination and continuation of pregnancy.  Justices  L. Nageswara Rao, S. A. Bobde

  • All women are entitled to safe and legal abortion

    State of Jharkhand v Shailendra Kumar Rai and Others SCC/SC/1294/2017 

    The Supreme Court has ruled that all women, regardless of their marital status, are entitled to benefits of safe and legal abortion up to 24 weeks of pregnancy, in another historic verdict. They declared that discrimination against women based on their marital status is against their right to equality. The Prosecution filed and appeal before the Supreme Court in order to overturn a man’s conviction and sentence for rape and murder of young girl in Jharkhand in November 2004. The victim alleged that the accused pushed her the ground and raped upon her and victim has been set on the fire by the accused after she shouted for the help and her grandfather, mother and villages residents came to her room and the accused was fled upon seeing upon them. The girl was afterwards taken to a hospital in Deoghar, where she underwent the ‘two finger test’. The SC gave the following  guidelines and declared that the persons found conducting the test would be guilty of misconduct. 

    • Ensuring that all public and private hospitals receive the guidelines created by the health ministry and family welfare.
    • The holding of workshops for medical professionals or employees to explain the correct procedure to be taken when examining rape and sexual assault survivors.
    • Review the medical school curriculum to make sure that the ‘two finger test’ or per vaginum examination is not listed as one of the methods to be used when assessing rape and sexual assault survivors.
    • The copy of the judgment must be given to the secretary, the ministry of health, and the government of India. Copies must also be sent to every state’s department of health.
    • The responsibility for seeing that these rules are followed rests with each department’s main secretaries.

    Justices DY Chandrachud and Hima Kohli

  • DV Act every Order is a Protection Order

    S. Amalraj v Kanikkaimarry, Crl.O.P. (MD) No. 15704/2018, Madras High CourtThe above petition was filed by the husband under S. 482 CrPC to quash the FIR filed against him u/s 31 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (DV Act) stating non payment of maintenance does not amount to breach of protection order. The Court held that S.31 is a key provision and heartbeat of the DV Act to regulate the violator of protection orders passed under S. 18. The question as to whether the law enforcing authority has jurisdiction to register a Criminal Case under S. 31 of the Act for non-payment of maintenance allowance which is deemed to be breach of protection order under S. 18 of the Act, is answered affirmatively and the law enforcing authority has jurisdiction to register the case and proceed in accordance with law for every breach of order without any legal bar for the reason that each breach of order amounts to a continuing offence‘ The court held that registration of the FIR by the police could not be faulted with. This Court without any ambiguity held  that non-payment of maintenance allowance would amount to economic abuse and the same will very well come under the umbrella of breach of protection order.